End of postings

I was looking at the readership stats and it seems the site has no significant viewership. I am going to write and ebook as another avenue of communication. I will try to market thru amazon and google I think.

A Year Later

We need to understand the site is still being used evidently. So here is a small form to learn.

Please reader the older posts to understand old Greek Forms. A sly vision before the eyes was to be the mystical form imagined. I can see the slight white spot as imagination, for example. A person has to practice to get stronger imagined things. It is like meditation, it is a relationsip with the subconciousness.

A white spot began the form, see the first posting. All that was necessary was to begin. ANd the meaning of usage was to be the later postings. All is well here in the School House, btw.

Note: I interrupt the discussion of the imaging to discuss logical symmetry. I will get back to imaging and its discussion as I try to built the site's visibility. Scroll down to the last post of this page to read the introduction and then sequentially read up.

It is a transform level of complexity so the visiting student need not truly learn to use the exact relation, but should understand the absolute importance of it.


Symmetry

A concept. And it is addressed many times necessarily because it is a certain relation transcendental of large extreme importance. When I say transcendental it appear a universal of sorts where its existence is seen in all manner of certain logical analysis. A relation to be defined.

Symmetry as the symbol is commonly held the cause of the equal image of the same. Making this Symmetry a distinctly difference idea about how the sameness appears. So I begin by stating a symmetry. And the thing to learn appears the usage in a logical analysis and then to utilize the relation as the cause of the form transformed.

When I speak of form I speak of the transcendental relation. And the left hand to the right hand denotes the most commonly encountered relation for the cause of the symmetry in all relationship is the relation.

I can then ask the person to consider wondering about the deepness of the world of many theoretical logics and to ask the reader to wonder for this statement of symmetry is a certain schools formal theory. And as such it is a very difficult study. A certain relation as symmetry then announces the success as the student appears w.

A single abstract first order logical statement was introduced and it means the symmetry. An odd form, for it makes the symbol appear the cause in an instance of usage. In other usages the relation then appears to make the letter w exist literally. In set theoretical terms an element of Aristotle’s category makes the relation exist. Causing the function of certain element.

A discovery a.

So the introduction has defined symmetry sufficiently and the whole world must either understand or deny the meaning of the symmetrical. A symmetrical then examples to hopefully convince the reader of the importance of logical symmetry in every example. A set as the subject then takes the next.

At this point the lexigraph appeals to the writer. A method of symbol to denote the symmetrical is given.


a->

A symbol and its symmetric.

Again the exact study of all example is to then appear to support. A as the large letter a, denotes the applied a-> as transform.

B,a->A
A set B as either the abstracted t or the ab.

And to infer the answer displays the level of student necessary study for the formal relation of inference is utilized to define.

All a as the set then A as the transform. Set then denotes the symmetrical transform and not the set of e.

A symbol is used in this fashion to cause the implied set called B. An original set defined independently by relation untransformed for only certain element appear related to A. A method of study then causes the necessary inference to transform. Application of symmetry is now a cause to transform itself revealing the th.

And here the a.

Inference of a to the t then causes the inverted relation of all relation? A form called a certain objective reductionist relation also held Plato’s certain form to relate all ideas. A study is then to proceed.

A,s->S where a appears the inverted.

Equated with

B, a->A. A property of commutation exists allowing the solution of all S in relation to all B.

B,c<-S An inverted a, as c<- relates commutatively. A certain cause to commutation appears the symmetric of q. Where q as size equal appeared the symmetric. I can not assis in interpreting the implication for the distinction between this symmetric and the example commonly found is a large and necessary study. All s then causes all certain B. A solution to the cause of all, as the question where the red as the next becomes the inverted, a. A common fallacy of the next ball as the true ball for how would all A be defined. Making the container the set a. A as the correct abstracted set of elements was never to exist in theory. A large decline in theory was the result making the study necessary to obviously compete in the realm of ideas. For all a as the element was caused by the relation and not the subjective existence claimed. The set is formally caused to exist and each element occurs as a result of the effect of relation. A striking difference in theory is obvious. All as the universal All is then required to discover All as a relation existent. Making the search for the correct method of fallacy difficult to master. All True Scotsman as the fallacy appears the symmetrical. A fallacy invented to discover the meaning of truth in relation to truth. Study its appearance. A true Scotsman called a. A Scotsman. A simple symmetric was applied to cause the a to invert A instead of the common transform. So here is the True Scotsman Fallacy in notation. a, s<- a Making all A equal n. The usage of the element Scotsman as the example should warn the reader as to the cause to the distinct quality of the fallacy. A symmetric element n was implicitly designed. A,n<-A is the symmetric. All true Scotsman. Making the title of the fallacy its inverted solution. So the cause to exist appears this relation I am defining. Symmetric. Abstract abstracted Scotsman appears the title to the particular element Scotsman. And so the formal symbol of set appear the quite odd relation. A scotsman. Making the small letter denote the element symbol to define the Scotsman of the title. And the independence of Scotsman to Scotsman is the communicative. A set independence alters the size of s relative to S only. The small s denoting Scotsman the symbol actually used in the fallacy prose, while the large letter S, denotes Scotsman the abstract set of true size Scotsman. So the size as the set itself appears the number of elements in relation to the a. Making the cause to number in the abstract the effect of all. All denotes the size of all such. All the inverted S appears the infinite as the size of the appearance of symbol is a cause to S number in this applied symmetric. A normal number is not caused by the usage of symbol, but the rather odd nature to the fallacy was instructive. Making the usage of symmetric indicative of the true Scotsman. A certain c. As common notation is violated as the prose capitalized the scotsman. Making the abstract inversion. A reading of the prose where small letter a as abstract then transforms the s to the correct fallacy used once more. S->s,N

A Scotsman as true was never Noble.

A large N denotes any symbol and the term applied was the word noble making the appearance of size the symmetric and the abstract size the letters. The fact of symbol causing set size is the artifact connotation the usage of the true Scotsman.

And so the reader is warned to consider the use of symmetry in more complex instances.

S,c<-m

A Scotsman, as red was seen joyfully jumping. A relation of number as the applied S is the example.

s, d<-d


The scot was dead all dead. All dead as the symbol size denotes the limit of no size applied. And this is the formally defined size of the s in the prose. Nonexistent.


A b. Appears the answer reply.

A person now must review the events learned. A Form will now be the word used to describe the sly imagined relation placed before the eyes.

It is skill some people are good at while I myself have little image. I can close my eyes and vision though. So everybody is a little different, but the strong geometric placement of the image before the eyes allows the relation of distance to assist the geometric analogy. So analogy is the use of the Form. It is a powerful tool to assist Nth Form or Category.

Here I speak of Category as equal to Form and this is because the system of analogy is so designed. A white spot for the abstract inverted symbol place in the tree of category. A black spot for looking top to bottom, down the tree.

Structured Imagination is to allow complete control of the relationship under examination. So we have the hands rotating to theoretically touch the person, thereby causing the handedness of the thing touched. And at this time the white spot is to be imagined for the set element is caused to exist by relation existence.

So abstract the geometric form being learned. A relation as the imagined hand touching the thing, you, to be given sides relative to the hand appears the visioned abstract relation. Making the Form appear stronger in imagery.

A correspondence of element appears and the person is found to be abstracting the tree once more.

A category tree location appears the elements perspective for the relation as symbol causes the tree to exist. I categorify with this design of visioning only.

When I speak of tree, I literally draw the inverted stem with spots to connect Nth levels.
A special ability to be developed is to appear to always abstractly alter the relation and correctly assign the desired, imagined object to represent the relation as a solution. Selecting the two hands to be visioned to represent the hand relation was a nontrivial discovery. Proper image selection is the ability of the theorist's capable student who can immediately abstract the design of my system and advise me of possible alternative Forms.

Needless

So the meaning of ancient Greek oral tradition becomes clearer. While reading or looking at the computer or paper it is impossible to imagine as Plato's advises. A clear need to imagine and talk became the school. A student is to learn to discover this vision of imagination so he may join the School.

I teach a very different type of category. A student must learn the absolute depth of the Allegory of the Cave. A true and real exiting is now possible for the English grammar reader. Imagine that. The two hands as abstract relation while the dark spot means abstracted symbol.

Before the eyes, the image is to now appear, and to discuss while imaging was the powerful necessity of written works separation, from the thinking training of Plato's School.

I am instructing the student in thinking or the world of relationships. An exact relation is now introduced to literally walk the student out of the cave of ignorance.

English translation of the works of Plato deny this ability because of the true depths of his cave of ignorance.

So turn away from the computer and vision the hands again. Left and right again, before the eyes.

A turn as the relation is to allow the exact form to be imaged. Plato's form is to appear before the eyes, literally. Exiting the student from the cave.

So turn hands.

A basic mystery would continue without well instructed school masters. How a relation is altered appears inference itself and to turn the hands requires the form itself to vision itself.

The exact relation of Greek inference. And so here is the next thing to do.

And so imagine the hands turning, rotating so one covers the other. A white spot appears along with the rotating hands. This is your imagination's assitance! A symmetry of abstract symbol causes the meaning of the white spot.

A person is caused to appear, the thinker appears as a category element, where symbol applies.
A symmetry of symbol allows the imagination of the thinker as the hand.

That was a lot to follow. But honestly try to rotate the hands and wait for the white spot to appear! Follow the imagination sometimes. Latter on I will instruct on this topic, but for now to clarify.

An undefined symbol was to be applied to that which has handedness. You are the set now.
So imagine the other side looking at your self. The other sider of the vision. Where there would be a black spot, as a point of view.

Yes rotation of the vision is allowed.

This complexity is introduced. And allows the symmetry of the set of the handed. A thing grasped immediately becomes a thing with left side and right side!

I have to closeup the school for the day. To make yourself given a leftside of right side in relation to symbol is the usage of the inference to image itself. A quite odd introduction closes and if you understand the depth of the necessary change in thinking you understand the depths of the cave itself.

So just think about it.

The cave is real. Think about the degree of change required to image and discuss the Forms.

As we left off. Imagine the pair of hands and the words, Hands before the eyes. This appears for real strongly with some people, whereas with others the skill must be developed.

Search the internet for the method of scientific relation reduction as a subject. A large controversy appears in evidence. All the while Plato's School House had it. I will instruct in the usage of the relation so the instilled student may matter of fact infer. The exact form of all is real.

Abstract.

And now the subject to alter the form before the eyes is the abstracted relation's usage, without visioning it. Use it in example and be patience for once the trial begins a student then either begins study here for real or does not.

Do you want to learn of Plato's School for real or just read about the subject. Being a logical person in the scientific world appears the usage. Relation pertaining to the minds effect in the world, called subjective relations, are never to be visioned. A love relation is not amenable to the reductionist form for study. Subjective is therefore not able to be consistently inferred!

Making the Scientific usage the only allowed world of Plato, for the consistent division of subjective to objective appears the benefit as will be discussed.

Study the topic of the Universal in the internet. It is a specific relation to the philosopher and allows the entity to be.

A method of Universal's appears the debate in modern times, all the while the form is to obey the law of the correct Universal. A first step to take as the student become the discovery of Universal.

Two Hands and the word hands before the eyes, denotes the relation of handedness and the associated word in the abstract. Abstraction as a topic is now introduced and must be mastered. Any word associated with the example is the abstracted symbol associated with the relation.

So replace the word hands with the abstract relation or symbol, and two relations must be visioned now! It is a hard task this first mastery. Take the challenge now or not.

It is a sly thing to have the symbol as any symbol. Be careful with the meaning of visioning. The mind is a complex thing and the instinctive belief appears the best guess at success or not.

This is the most difficult vision to master, it will be this simple. Nth Form study.

Any symbol as abstract symbol with the pair of hands! This easy?

What does my instinct tell me. I vision a dark spot with the pair of hands. A dark spot to represent any symbol. Abstract relation of symbol appears the darker spot near the pair of hands.

Dark, being the place for any symbol to exist.

So begins the quest. Universal as the exact correct relation appears this in proper world of Plato.

So I will open this to debate. Please challenge this philosopher. Why bother, with Universal as imagined in this fashion? It is difficult to master in any ones school. Why this one, a black spot as the abstracted, any symbol, for the handedness relation, a pair of hands. Why?

And of course it appears any symbol as the sfurthure in futher visioning, Can the pair of hand be simple replaced? Yes. change the relation of hands now. And the power of the Universal appears. A lack of symbol representation appears to be the subject.

And so why this form of the Universal?

It is unconventional as the Universal, but appears the best usage for everyday envisionment of Nth category subject. It is the literallylitterally imagining the top of the Nth category tree and looking down its axis.

And there you are with the power to imagine all symbol set, for all relation set, as the stack of Nth Form or category.

Please stay and structure the imagination.

An Introduction was given and for time is short today a single thing to next try.

Play with the two hands and allow the symbol, the words "hands" to appear along with the two hands.

A pair of things imagined is then in vision before the eyes.

Reductionisn in objective things is real. A single relation to allow all to be inferred is the quest for the student. Please be patient and I will instruct.

With time the instructions here are such to allow the exact Nth category to be toyed with in the mind correctly. High level logic demands a quest. And Plato's visioning is found superior to no structuring of the imagination.

A single relation as Form was to turn the world. A person who structures imagination, as Plato's is this one. The Form as ethereal in quality was to be translated correctly. And due to uncommon difficulty, the person must read this website.

My website.

A small outpost in the world where abstract subject to the reader is the only allowed relation. High western language or first order subject predicate appears the transition of the reader to the pattern visioning of Plato.

When ethereal quality is given as translation, somebody must place this correctly in the entire English-speaking world.

A vision is a simple eyesight imagined symbol or relation. The thing thought of, as imagined before the eyes.

And so begins the quest. I have the sole translation of Plato in the Internet?

Search the web for Plato and his Forms and the mystery was to ever be present. I can only imagine why. Here I am the sole person in the English language civilization with the translation.

Forms are always define or ethereally discussed. Why this confusion?

So this outpost is rather a torrid affair and to simply imagine, as the world of Plato desired was to be so simple task. A child was to forever imagine the form.

To imagine connotates the examination of the location. And to present the study necessity to the reader is to allow the school of Plato to instruct. A mind clearly exists with the power to imagine.
And once the image in the mind or heads location is envisioned, please consider placing the vision elsewhere. Imagine the letter S before your eyes.

And here begins Plato.

A symbol before the eyes is a structure to imagination. I can then advise the reader to consider the implication. And so the school is to advise a simple playful understanding of this visioning.

A student as capable will then ask the question why.

And so the answer was to be found in Plato's Forms. A school of visioning the reduction relation. A foundational causal inference relates all scientific theory as with the theory of sides to the body, left and right handed. A relation is then to replace the symbol. Allow the two hands to be imagined before the eyes. Do this. Stop reading and turn away from the computer and imagine the two hands left and right, before the eyes.

It is a slight thing imagination, but the vague imagery is real. When you are practiced the imagination becomes strong and of such quality that very complex relations may be imagined before the questioning student.

Plato's form or the correct reductionism is found. Search reductionist or reduction is a philosophical topic.

I am opening this blogsite to allow the sole Internet resource on Plato to begin.

No other site teaching his form as visioning exists. And the benefit to the capable student appears complex analysis. A single beginning was attempted elsewhere on the internet and the controversy of structured imagination appeared.

Just begin to imagine a school where the relation and associated symbol are placed in the ewe's world. And so I have this single reference to suggest. The Allegory of the Cave.

It is real.

It is substantially different.

And it is lost.

I claim to be the sole student left alive because of five years of searching for true students. None are present.

The link here is because the writer was capable. And the meaning of simple steps in learning was the Allegory.